EPSRC acknowledges that it is a challenge for applicants to determine the future impacts of COVID-19 while the pandemic continues to evolve. Reviewers are requested to comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management making reference to equipment and resources as follows: You should draw attention to any request that in your view has not been justified or, conversely, if something is required but has not been identified. Institutions may or may not . comment explicitly on the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third party contribution. You are asked to comment on the project plan and management arrangements, which should be proportionate to the scale and complexity of the activity proposed. Reviewers are requested to comment on the degree of research excellence of the proposal, making reference to three key aspects: Applicants are asked to set their proposal in context, in terms of the current state of knowledge and other work under way in the field. | Learn more about Thomas Kecker's work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn cover letter optional attachment (mandatory for New Investigator Award), no page limit, not seen by peer review. Applicants are permitted to only be involved with 1 application for this funding opportunity. case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit. This funding opportunity is only open to early career researchers who meet the eligibility requirements of the EPSRC New Investigator Award scheme. The Adaptus Research Group Working within the project team for the EPSRC project "Linking formation mechanisms, nanostructure and function in metal oxide nanosheets using multimodal characterisation" (EP/W026937/1). You will be given 2 weeks to provide a response to the questions raised by the introducers. You may request funding for staff costs, equipment and other items required to carry out the project, costs related to impact, and travel and subsistence. EPSRC will not fund a project if it believes that there are ethical concerns that have been overlooked or not appropriately accounted for. EPSRC Archives - Research Support Blog - The University of Salford Blog https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-applicants/what-to-include-in-your-proposal/overview-of-information-needed-for-your-proposal, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system, preparing new proposals in light of EPSRCs policy on resubmissions, what makes a good project partner letter of support, how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance, Overview of information needed for your proposal, case for support totalling up to eight A4 sides, comprising up to two A4 sides for a track record, and six A4 sides describing proposed research and its context. no. Specific guidance is available for each section of the report to be completed. The full economic cost of your project can be up to 4. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter | Top Writers Acceptance to the New Investigator Award scheme is judged by EPSRC before the application is sent to expert peer review and is made on the basis of the content of the cover letter and the level of resources requested in the application. Where the applicants have ticked any boxes confirming that the application involves either animal research or human participation, then you are asked to comment specifically on any ethical considerations and particularly on whether ethical approval procedures have been complied with. There is no page limit, but letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. EPSRC does not assess the presence or value of any matched funding provided by the university before making a funding decision. The reviewer form asks reviewers to summarise their view of the application. You will be a part of the decision-making process and get a broad view of the novel ideas coming through the funding pipeline in your area. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Robert. whether the research programme and associated impact activities have been co-designed with external stakeholders or users: Does the proposal include objectives for impact related activities and are they appropriate to the research? New Investigator Awards are aimed at helping early career academics initiate their own independent research programme. The research excellence of the proposal, making reference to: The ability to deliver the proposed project, making reference to: The effectiveness of the proposed planning and management and whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified, making reference to: Feedback will not be provided following the prioritisation panel meeting. You can look for examples of funded projects by searching for new investigator in our online portfolio. This helps reviewers make informed judgements about whether the resources requested are appropriate for the research proposed. You and your international partners may have a previous relationship, but we do not expect you to have worked together extensively. For more information, see guidance on what makes a good project partner letter of support. EPSRC is committed to support the recommendations and principles set out by the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Where candidates are unclear on their eligibility for a particular scheme after consulting the guidance, frequently asked questions, and their research office, then they can contact EPSRC for advice. illustrated by examples of recent activities. Applicants are encouraged to have early discussions with their institutions to identify what training and development opportunities are available to meet their aspirations over the duration of the proposal. The study, published in PLOS ONE, brought together researchers and clinicians at UCL Engineering, UCLH and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana to investigate a new non-invasive diagnostic technique using smartphone photographs of the eye and face. However, prioritisation meetings generally find reviews most useful where they explicitly identify the main strengths and weaknesses in the application, while also giving a clear view on which should be accorded the greater significance and why. The UK is at the forefront of addressing global societal and economic challenges that have engineering and physical sciences at the heart, including climate change, cyber security and long-term sustainable growth. Fellowships | The University of Edinburgh Sample Resume For Tile Business Owner, Curriculum Vitae De Cuitlahuac Garcia Jimenez, About A Boy Help Essay, Sample B E Cse Resume, Examples Writing Methodology . PDF Centre for Research on Evolution, Search and Testing (CREST) Total Price. (for example, shipping ports) or where clusters are connected across several sites (for example, as a result of their supply chain or other activity . whether the proposal demonstrates that the applicants have the expertise and capabilities to deliver the project. Typical examples are the production of ammonia, which is a process that needs to be catalysed by iron, or the production . EPSRC: Early career researcher collaborations for global development how competitive the proposed work is and how it compares to related international activity, whether the applicants show how their research fits with activities elsewhere in the world and whether they demonstrate awareness of the context and landscape within which they operate, to what extent the research will provide the UK with a unique capability, whether the applicant has presented the academic, industrial, policy, societal or other relevant context clearly. These will be viewed against published applicant eligibility and project suitability guidance. Any investigators who do not have a Je-S account must register for one at least 7 working days before the opportunity deadline. EPSRC New Investigator Awards | Research Operations Office The proposal cover letter should also be used to highlight anything that has been discussed and agreed with EPSRC staff beforehand. New Investigator Award ESRC Secondary Data Analysis Initiative Open Call SAGES Large Proposal Challenge Fund (LPCF) . We recommend you start your application in good time. The panel will then use the information provided in the applications and the responses to the questions raised by the introducers to rank the proposals, using the assessment criteria, at a prioritisation panel meeting. Three written quotations are required for single items of equipment costing more than 138,000 and must accompany the proposal. When adding a new proposal you should select: Your application should include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDFs to avoid errors. meet the eligibility criteria of EPSRC New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme. Sample Submission: 13 December 2023 Outline Deadline: 29 March 2023 Full Proposal Deadline: 13 June 2023 . This funding opportunity is also subject to our policy on repeatedly unsuccessful submissions. On Tuesday 25 July 2017 a New Investigator Award scheme replaced the First Grant initiative. Whether they are successful or unsuccessful, applicants who apply for an early career researcher international collaboration grant are still eligible to apply for a New Investigator Award. Where applicants wish to include details on flexible working or a career break for reviewers to take into account in their assessment, they are not required to explain the personal circumstances that resulted in the need for this. It may be that you feel you can only comment with authority on a specific part or component of an application, for example with a multidisciplinary project, or perhaps where there is a strong user-led element. The New Investigator Award scheme (which replaces the First Grant scheme) includes a number of changes from the previous scheme of which researchers who are considering applying should be aware.. Customer Reviews. You can apply for a new investigator award if you: You would be classed as having received a significant research grant if a project you led received: You may still apply if you hold or have held: Holders of postdoctoral level fellowships are not eligible to hold an EPSRC grant. It is preferable that collaborative partners will contribute cash to the project, although "tangible" material contributions from industrial collaborators may also be consider The track record should cover the UK and international partners, postdoctoral staff, researcher co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time). A proposal that demonstrates excellence can be characterised by terms such as: novel, ambitious, timely, exciting, at the international forefront, adventurous, elegant, or transformative, but it need not demonstrate all of them. You should provide your overall assessment of the application. EPSRC: New Investigator Award | Instrumentl The case for support should describe the proposed research and its intended outcomes. Creating a Full Proposal and Electronic Submission. For a Principal Investigator with option for one or more Co-Investigators. This is mainly assured by requiring that universities have in place and operate appropriate ethical approval processes. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. For the New Investigator Award the proposal cover letter should describe how your experience and career history fit with the person eligibility guidance. You should explicitly consider the amount of time being allocated to the project by the applicant in this assessment. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . This must be attached, as a single document, using the Case for Support attachment type in Je-S, justification of resources up to two A4 sides, CVs, up to two A4 sides each, for named research staff (including researcher co-investigators), or visiting researchers. A project partner letter of support, from each project partner listed, must be included as an attachment. The applicant is not expected to predict the impact of their research in terms of value, reach or significance, and therefore assessors should not: Drawing upon what the applicant has said, reviewers should comment on: The extent to which each bullet point is addressed will depend on the nature of the research proposed. The New Investigator Award scheme will. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter | Best Writers We recognise that we have a duty of care to promote approaches to responsible innovation that will initiate ongoing reflection about the potential ethical and societal implications of the research that we sponsor and to encourage our research community to do likewise. Your application is assessed first and foremost on quality (primary), followed by national importance (secondary major). PDF Applying for ESRC New Investigator Grants - Parker Derrington Ltd New Investigator Award: Starts: 05 January 2021: Ends: 04 August 2023: Value (): 243,689: . Certainty of outcome is not an indicator of excellence, but neither is an incremental approach necessarily an indicator that a proposal lacks excellence. Proposed collaborations for this open funding route may involve international research partners from any country, this can include researchers in 1 or more lower middle income, low income, or least developed countries on the Development Assistance Committee list, where the focus of the research is outside the official development assistance compliance criteria. HiDRA (Hierarchical Deep Representations of Anatomy) will address these challenges by developing a "multi-view-multi-task" approach that is . EPSRC . Read the, the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit, the novelty, relationship to the context, timeliness and relevance to identified stakeholders, the ambition, adventure, transformative aspects or potential outcomes, the suitability of the proposed methodology and the appropriateness of the approach to achieving impact. For more information see host organisation statement for New Investigator Award. Also, as Je-S does not support all Microsoft Office Word font types, unsupported fonts will be replaced, possibly resulting in layout changes to the document. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. Pre-proposal writing steps - thinking about the proposal. If the application is in a subject or area that causes you serious personal concern, to the extent that you feel you cannot provide an objective review, you should decline to review the application giving the reason as other, and stating ethical issues in the comment box. EPSRC Capital Award in Support of Early Career Researchers Your host organisation will also be able to provide advice and guidance. Find out more about the new investigator award expectationsincluding what we are looking for and the support expected from your host organisation. However, they are not subject to the same eligibility restrictions as new . As part of the impact assessment, reviewers comment on whether a collaboration is appropriate; therefore, a good project partner letter of support shows that the collaboration is genuine, and explains why the project partner supports the project. British Geotechnical Association - Gold Medal for best paper of 2020 2020. International Young Geotechnical Engineer Conference Award, Engineers Ireland Aug 2009. EPSRC cannot advise on which scheme is likely to be suitable. This makes it easier for the panel to assess how complete and convincing the applicants responses are. Find out more about what to include in the case for support. As impact should be an embedded activity in the research programme, you should also assess the suitability and appropriateness of the methodology to realise impact in the proposal. The assessment of the expert panel will be shared with you ahead of the prioritisation meeting. Develop and integrate energy storage technologies at grid scale . Your application is assessed by peer review. Best Paper Award at the Civil Engineering Research in Ireland (CERI) conference August 2022. The Functional Genomics Initiative Clusters funding opportunity has two stages. The justification of resources, taking up to two A4 sides, should explain the necessity of your requested resources to your research project, including implementing the Impact Plan. EPSRC new investigator award - UKRI - Research Councils UK It is expected that part of the developmental aspect of a New Investigator Award will involve support from the university and, where possible, an assigned student. Find out more about completing your application. Ethical considerations should not therefore normally be an assessment criterion and you should not take these into account when making your assessment. EPSRC guidance can be found in the additional info section. Quotes should include VAT, delivery charges and incorporate any standard academic discounts. You should indicate those aspects that you accorded higher or lower priority and why. Questions can be submitted prior to the event using the EPSRC international team email address or during the webinar using the question and answer function. whether the proposal details potential outcomes and clearly identifies any potential impacts. National importance should also be a major consideration in making your assessment. Find out more about our research areas and themes. This document is the principal opportunity to explain to reviewers . Reviewers should comment on how the research relates to EPSRCs research areas and strategies (many projects will be relevant to more than one EPSRC research area) and complements EPSRCs current portfolio. comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management, and on whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified. However, unless there are exceptional reasons why an organisation cannot meet the requirements to be a project partner, EPSRC will not accept letters of support. * SFI (Ireland) FNR . Three quotations for any equipment costing more than 25,000 should accompany the proposal. Ed Baines. It is particularly important therefore that the panel have clear advice on the merits of each component. NIA1: Acceptance to the Scheme. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Order . Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. Graduated with a PhD in Mathematics from UCL in 2014, and a Master's in Physics from the University of Hamburg, Germany. Case for support, totalling up to eight A4 sides, comprising up to two A4 sides for a track record, and six A4 sides describing proposed research and its context. Case for support - EPSRC - Research Councils UK The NIA expectations documentgives some guidelines for applicants to consider during the initial formulation of their proposals with regards to the expected scope and features of their application. contributes to, or helps maintain, the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges or contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry(s), complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity. Those who are seeking to substantially exceed this should consider other funding opportunities. Our trusted research and innovation principles set out UKRIs expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration. EPSRC Impact Acceleration Account | Research | Queen's University Belfast Customer Reviews. Where known impacts have occurred, these should have been highlighted in the application, including the assumptions and information at the point of submission. Last updated on 2023/02/23 We will fund 80% of the full economic costs of your project. 15 Customer reviews. For visiting researchers, include details of previous visits or collaborations with overseas researchers. EPSRC New Investigator Award replaces the First Grant Scheme Smartphone App Detects Anaemia in Kids Sooner | Mirage News If there is significant demand, then we may group the applications by topic and run 2 or more prioritisation panels. Expression of interest: Human Functional Genomics Initiative clusters letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form (no page limit), technical assessments for facilities listed as requiring one in the Je-S guidance (no page limit), host organisation letter of support (2 pages), cover letter (optional attachment, no page limit, not seen by peer review). Now in its fifth edition, it is intended to provide an overview of research interests, to function as a guide for prospective (as well as current . So nothing is missed, EPSRC recommends that you follow the Cost to the Proposal headings used in the application form. Frequently asked questions and webinar questions (PDF, 420KB). When undertaking your assessment of the research project, you should consider the unequal impacts of the impact that COVID-19 related disruption might have had on the track record and career development of those individuals included in the proposal, and you should focus on the capability of the applicant and their wider team to deliver the research they are proposing. A significant grant is usually defined as including more than 6 months of postdoctoral research associate (PDRA) time, capital equipment in excess of 20,000, or in excess of 100,000 full economic costing on 1 individual grant. We will use this information to help plan the proposal assessment, for example to understand expected submission levels and the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit. Your host organisations statement of support is important. complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio. the applicant and wider teams ability to deliver the project through to the creation of impact.