Ford 1997 Washington Cars for sale - SmartMotorGuide.com (Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . There isnt any secret code to deciphering the submission tracker. They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc. [CDATA[> To obtain Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Thank you for visiting nature.com. If Nature declines to publish a paper and does not suggest resubmission, authors are strongly advised to submit their paper for publication elsewhere. Research suggests that . Graduated from ENSAT (national agronomic school of Toulouse) in plant sciences in 2018, I pursued a CIFRE doctorate under contract with SunAgri and INRAE in Avignon between 2019 and 2022. editor decision started nature I am at the same stage. Unfortunately, as a freelancer, it comes with the job. Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. Do the revisions and resubmit. It could mean just about anything. ]]> ]]> Sometimes, the decision for the editor is really easy and quick and sometimes rather difficult and time-consuming. All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. good luck!! Obviously, the most difficult situations are those in which the reviewers arrive at nearly or . Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection Was your paper accepted? For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Hi! Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. What does editor decision started mean nature? sciencenature - Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. Editors encourage authors in highly technical disciplines to provide a slightly longer summary paragraph that descries clearly the basic background to the work and how the new results have affected the field, in a way that enables nonspecialist readers to understand what is being described. Reviews for "Nature Communications" - Page 1 - SciRev 172.104.52.81 Individuals often make decisions based on what they believe to be the historical purposes and goals of an institution. When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. Share. ISSN 1546-1726 (online) All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. If appropriate, delegate parts of the response to one or more of the co-authors. Does "editor decision started" mean rejection in Nature journals? It only takes a minute to sign up. How long and formal should a paper revision letter to the editor be? Thanks! As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. //--> 9.3 weeks. Cactus Communications. Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF In a perfect world, we would consult with dozens of experts, who would spend many hours considering every point in the manuscript. My paper has been in that state for over a month, but the editor let us know it was going out for peer review. We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. response letterresubmit, 3. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. If the reviewers wish to be named their names will appear in alphabetical order at the end of the paper in a statement as below: Any reviewers that wish to remain anonymous will be acknowledged using a slightly modified statement: If no reviewers agree to be named, we will still acknowledge their valuable service using the statement below: Nature makes decisions about submitted papers as rapidly as possible. To complicate matters further, editors must base their decisions on evidence that is never completely reliable. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision ISSN 0028-0836 (print), report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). This scheme only applies to original research Articles, and not to Review articles or to other published content. For those who have contemplated pleading for that precious second chance, we simply don't know where to start. It is difficult to predict the outcome of the manuscript at this stage, but you can be hopeful. Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. Thanks! To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. The Senior Editor then assesses the manuscript for its quality and perceived level of advance and then either recommends a reject decision or assigns peer reviewers. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. Determine why this decision will make a difference to your customers or fellow employees. //--> Most respectable journals have a definite map designed since submission, first editoroial decision, review time, last editorial decision, Editing and publication. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Nature Neuroscience The reviewers only make recommendations. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? Performance & security by Cloudflare. Decision in progress means all the reviews have already been received and whats left is for the editor to make a decision. Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. In addition, most authors are genuinely excited about their work, and usually submit to Nature Neuroscience because they believe that the paper deserves high-profile publication. More importantly, in the rejection letter it was evident that the Editor had taken the time to read through our manuscript and had given it some thought . Authors are free to discuss their paper with the media from six days before the publication date, and are asked to ensure that Nature Research's embargo conditions are understood by journalists and others. [CDATA[// >